Gendering the right to the city

Citizenship, environmental justice, and the role of place-making

This study explores the role of place-making as a form of urban citizenship in addressing gendered and intersectional structural barriers to the appropriation and use of urban space. Building on the assumption that place-making practices can challenge existing power relations, it investigates how women positioned at the intersection of multiple axes of social stratification navigate and contest eco-social constraints in claiming the right to the city. Focusing on everyday practices in Bielefeld, the research examines how these enactments of citizenship foster belonging, socio-spatial connectedness, and engagement with environmental justice. By tracing how urban environments reproduce or disrupt inequalities, the study seeks to uncover pathways toward more inclusive, equitable, and environmentally just cities.

  • gendered citizenship
  • the right to the city
  • urban environmental justice
  • place-making

Context

Urban environmental justice encompasses not only equitable access to resources, such as city parks or socio-cultural facilities, and protection from environmental stressors, including construction noise or air pollution, but also the right to the city as a socio-ecological citizenship practice. A key facet of such citizenship is place-making, understood as the democratic appropriation of urban green, blue, or grey spaces and the experience of socio-spatial connectedness.1 This involves not only spatial access but also active use and shaping of space, contributing to psychosocial well-being and a sense of ‘being at home’, including perceptions of place attachment and belonging.2 Place-making practices are relevant not only for health and social cohesion but also for fostering socio-ecological transformation efforts. Local identification can encourage participation, neighbourhood care, and civic engagement, and also prevent vandalism,3 whereas lack of identification can produce ‘non-places’,4 indifference, and harmful urban conditions.5 Yet, structural and gendered barriers, such as women’s underrepresentation in environmental decision-making and the challenge of reconciling safety concerns with environmental goals, shape how women navigate place-making.6 This raises questions about how these tensions influence women’s urban citizenship practices.

Aims

This research investigates how women with intersecting social positions experience and contest structural and eco-social barriers in claiming their right to the city. It examines women’s everyday place-making practices as expressions of urban citizenship that cultivate belonging, socio-spatial connectedness, and engagement with environmental justice. Drawing on performative theories of urban space appropriation7 and concepts such as sense of place, or niche construction,8 the study explores how power relations shape the right to the city and influence women’s ability to enact citizenship practices, mobilize place-making resources, and develop socio-spatial connectedness. The research is grounded in the assumption that spaces are socially constructed9 and that cities are relational, socially produced environments shaped by societal characteristics and embedded power structures.10 Place-making is thus understood as an active instrument for challenging and addressing existing power relations, offering both a theoretical contribution to debates on the right to the city from a citizenship perspective – understood not only in legal or political but also in social and spatial terms – and practical insights for fostering environmentally just urban spaces.

Research design

The study adopts a qualitative research design. Data are collected through semi-structured interviews of Bielefeld citizens, complemented by neighbourhood walks that capture embodied, relational, and spatial experiences of everyday city life. Interviews are analysed using critical discourse analysis (CDA) to explore how narratives, practices, and interactions articulate urban citizenship and environmental justice. Neighbourhood walks are examined through detailed observational notes and spatial mapping, highlighting areas of inclusion, exclusion, and engagement. Building on theoretical insights from critical public health, eco-feminism, and citizenship studies, the findings are to provide a nuanced understanding of the role place-making plays in claiming the right to the city and shaping urban environmental justice trajectories.

Supervisors:

Figure 1. Kesselbrink in Bielefeld. Image © Laura Dominique Pesliak.
Figure 1. Kesselbrink in Bielefeld. Image © Laura Dominique Pesliak.

References

  1. E.F. Isin (2000) Introduction: Democracy, citizenship, and the city. In E.F. Isin (ed.), Democracy, citizenship and the global city, Oxford: Blackwell, 1–22; T. Blokland, C. Hentschel, A. Holm, H. Lebuhn, and T. Margalit (2015) Urban citizenship and right to the city: The fragmentation of claims. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 655–65.
  2. R. Gifford (2014) Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 541–79; J.C. Häberlen (2019) Feeling at home in lonely cities: An emotional history of the West German urban commune movement during the long 1970s. Urban History, 48(1), 143–61; T.C. Vollmer, G. Koppen, and K. Kohler (2020) The impact of urban architecture on health: The PAKARA model. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 63(8), 972–78.
  3. N. Mihaylov and D.D. Perkins (2014) Community place attachment and its role in social capital development. In L. Manzo and P. Devine-Wright (eds.), Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications, Routledge, London; Vollmer et al. (2020), 972–78.
  4. Augé, M. (1994) Orte und Nicht-Orte: Vorüberlegungen zu einer Ethnologie der Einsamkeit. Fischer, Frankfurt.
  5. Vollmer et al. (2020), 972–78.
  6. L. Ramstetter and F. Habersack (2019) Do women make a difference? Analysing environmental attitudes and actions of Members of the European Parliament. Environmental Politics, 29(6), 1063–84; N.H.M. Hashim, S.K.S.O. Thani, M.A. Jamaludin, and N.M. Yatim (2016) A perceptual study on the influence of vegetation design towards women’s safety in public park. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 234, 280–88; H.P. Hsu, M.G. Boarnet, and D. Houston (2019) Gender and rail transit use: Influence of environmental beliefs and safety concerns. Transportation Research Record, 2673(4), 327–38; E.A. Roper (2016) Concerns for personal safety among female recreational runners. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 24(2), 91–98.
  7. J. Butler (1997) Gender is burning: Questions of appropriation and subversion. Cultural Politics 11, 381–95.
  8. A. Farina, S. Scozzafava, and B. Napoletano (2007) Therapeutic landscapes: Paradigms and applications. Journal of Mediterranean Ecology, 8, 9–13; H. Hashemnezhad, A.A. Heidari, and P. Mohammad Hoseini (2013) Sense of place and place attachment. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 3(1), 5–12; T.J.M. Mattijssen, A.P.N. Van der Jagt, A.E. Buijs, B.H.M. Elands, S. Erlwein, and R. Lafortezza (2017) The long-term prospects of citizens managing urban green space: From place making to place-keeping? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 26, 78–84.
  9. T. Gabrielson and K. Parady (2010) Corporeal citizenship: Rethinking green citizenship through the body. Environmental Politics, 19(3), 374–91; S. Huning (2019) From feminist critique to gender mainstreaming – and back? The case of German urban planning. Gender, Place & Culture, 27(7), 944–64.
  10. J. Dünne and S. Günzel (eds.) (2006) Raumtheorie: Grundlagentexte aus Philosophie und Kulturwissenschaften. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.